The Benefits of Changing Your Spotlight to a Floodlight
A common decision-making mistake is that we sincerely believe ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ธ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด. This happens nonconsciously. Before we know it, weโve turned on our internal spotlight and are looking hard at what it has lit up.
But a spotlight only shines a part on the stage. It leaves a lot more unseen. That is why I suggest that you turn on what I call your floodlights. Making a consequential-irreversible decision is like combing through a forest. You need the power of floodlights to search for clues.
How do you switch from spotlight to floodlight?
Dan and Chip Heath, authors of the book ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ด๐ช๐ท๐ฆ, suggest three ways to break out of binary thinking.
๐๐๐๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฉ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ: Say youโre torn between staying in a relationship or leaving it. Now imagine one of the two options (leaving) youโre considering is off the table. What would you do?
What could you do to make your everyday happier? How can you enjoy your partnerโs company better? How can you feel more empowered?
๐๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ: Instead of having to make an either-or decision, we could look to make a both-and decision.
For the same decision as above, assume that youโre feeling emotionally unfulfilled in your relationship. Instead of having to make a tough choice between staying or leaving right away, could you consider speaking to a friend who relates to you or join a group of like-minded people?
Parents of young children are already familiar with this. They tend to design solutions as win-win. Go to the food court instead of a restaurant so that your son could have Chinese and your daughter Mexican.
๐๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: Consider what else could you do with the money/time/resources youโre committing to an option.
In 1983, the CEO of Quaker acquired the parent company of Gatorade for $220mn. It was by an impulsive buy, and it led to stunning growth for Gatorade ($3bn). A decade later, the same CEO made another gut buy: Snapple for $1.8bn. Far fewer readers would know Snapple compared to Gatorade, so that should tell you how that deal turned out.
But what happened in the case of Snapple? Quaker framed the decision as:
1. ๐๐ถ๐บ ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ
2. ๐๐ฐ๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ฃ๐ถ๐บ ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ.
Instead ofโฆ
1. ๐๐ถ๐บ ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ
2. ๐๐ฐ๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ฃ๐ถ๐บ ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ. Keep the $1.8bn for other purchases.
Looking at a big decision beyond a โwhether or notโ frame means youโre not at the mercy of your spotlight. It is the first step. You need to follow that up by turning on your floodlights and lighting up all there is to see.